PTW
  • Users Online: 23
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Ahead of Print

A comparative study of pulmonary toxicity between hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated radiation therapy in postmastectomy carcinoma breast


1 Department of Radiotherapy, Asansol District Hospital, Asansol, India
2 Department of Radiotherapy, Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, India
3 Department of Radiotherapy, Coochbehar Government Medical College and Hospital, Coochbehar, West Bengal, India
4 Department of Radiotherapy, College of Medicine and Sagore Dutta Hospital, Kolkata, India

Correspondence Address:
Linkon Biswas,
Department of Radiotherapy, Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jrcr.jrcr_44_22

Background: Hypofractionated schedule has multiple advantages over conventional fractionation radiation therapy in terms of logistics and patient compliance. However, pulmonary toxicity is a major concern in breast cancer radiotherapy about which there are limited data comparing these two radiation regimens. Objective: This study aimed at comparing these two radiation schedules in terms of acute pulmonary toxicity and parameters of pulmonary function. Materials and Methods: Postmodified radical mastectomy patients with nonmetastatic carcinoma breast were randomized into two groups: study-arm patients received hypofractionated radiotherapy with 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions, over 3.5 weeks, whereas control-arm patients received conventionally fractionated radiotherapy with 50 Gy in 25 fractions, over 5 weeks. Patients underwent pulmonary function test (PFT) before radiotherapy (baseline), then at one and 3 months after completion of radiotherapy for changes in parameters of PFT and acute toxicities. Results: PFT changes were comparable in both the arms at day 30 and day 90 postradiation. Incidences of cough 1 month after radiotherapy and 3 months after radiotherapy were comparable (P = 0.3 and 0.07). Higher grade dyspnea at 3 months posttreatment, though numerically was higher in the study arm, was not significant (P = 0.44). In study arm at 90 days postradiation, Grade 2 and Grade 3 radiation pneumonitis were numerically more (15% vs. 3% and 3.5% vs. 0%), but not statistically significant (P = 0.08). Conclusion: Both conventional and hypofractionated arms showed almost similar results in terms of acute pulmonary toxicity and change in PFT parameters. Hence, considering the logistic advantages, the hypofractionated schedule can be considered an effective alternative to conventional radiotherapy for postmastectomy breast cancer patients.


Print this article
Search
 Back
 
  Search Pubmed for
 
    -  Manna D
    -  Sharma S
    -  Roy C
    -  Biswas L
    -  Dasgupta A
    -  Das TK
 Citation Manager
 Article Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed116    
    PDF Downloaded3    

Recommend this journal